McGugin v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court, in reviewing a preliminary 22 HRE V. FLORIDA ENTERTAINMENT MGMT. injunction, “express[ed] no opinion on the ultimate merits of [the] action”
• determining $1,000 bond in class action not to be an abuse of discretion in light of the showing that “the vast majority of aliens[affected by class action] were very poor”
• applying Oppenheimer Fund to shift notice-related tasks to defendant in class action certified under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(2)
• rejecting defendants' argument that § 1252(g) deprived court of jurisdiction to \stay deportation pending resolution of [plaintiffs'] constitutional claims.\
• determining $1,000 bond in class action not to be an abuse of discretion in fight of the showing that “the vast majority of aliens[affected by class action] were very poor”
• The district court did not err in requiring the plaintiffs to post a nominal bond of $1,000 pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).