McGuffin v. Terrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “evidently the jury found appellant’s injury so minimal as to not warrant an award for past pain and suffering,” despite jury’s award of medical expenses for treatment of muscle spasms
• holding sum of $50.00 was a reasonable and necessary amount for the examination and treatment of appellant for injury resulting from collision
• holding sum of $50.00 was a reasonable and necessary amount for the examination and treatment of appellant for injury resulting from collision
• stating that “evidently the jury found appellant’s injury so minimal as to not warrant an award for past pain and suffering” despite the jury’s award of medical expenses for treatment of muscle spasms
• noting that after a car accident, the plaintiff did not complain of any injury at the scene, responded that “she did not know” whether she was injured, returned home, later complained of pain, and first showed an objective injury three weeks after the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).