Skip to main content
· 3/25/2022

McGrone v. Austin III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting preference for summonses over warrants to arrest in juvenile context
  • \A statute's meaning 'must be reasonable and supported by the ... history of the statute' \
  • “As with all matters of statutory interpretation, we look first to the plain meaning of the statutory language”
  • \We presume that the Legislature enacts legislation with an aware[ness] of the prior state of the law as explicated by the decisions of this court\ [citation omitted]
  • Commonwealth may, within double jeopardy limits, proceed on both tracks simultaneously

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.