McGriggs v. Mississippi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reinstating summary judgment because the claimant could not establish a prima facie case of toxic exposure without expert testimony to establish causation
• reinstating summary judgment because the claimant could not establish a prima facie case of toxic exposure without expert testimony to establish causation
• rejecting argument that expert witness, at the Daubert hearing, pre-trial motion stage, is required to cite to specific literature
• “Establishing general causation and specific causation in cases involving exposure to mold or other toxic substances involves a scientific inquiry, and thus causation must be established by the testimony of a medical expert.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).