Skip to main content
· 7/23/2003

McGriff v. Dept. of Corrections

Citations

  • 338 F.3d 1231
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14712
  • 2003 WL 21700115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a claim that trial counsel prevented the defendant from testifying after the district court had conducted two evidentiary hearings on the issue
  • affirming district court’s finding that defendant was informed of his right to testify based on attorney’s testimony that “her ordinary practice was to advise her clients as to the consequences of testifying, and she never prevented clients from taking the stand”
  • “Absent evidence of clear error, we consider ourselves bound by a district court’s findings of fact and credibility determinations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Black, Hull

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.