Skip to main content
· 8/11/1992

McGriff v. BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLE

Citations

  • 613 A.2d 688
  • 149 Pa. Commw. 638
  • 1992 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any reliance by the parole board on inadmissible hearsay did not violate due process
  • concluding that a petition sounded in mandamus and was within our original jurisdiction when the petitioner “alleged an error by the Board in the application of the regulations governing detainer orders”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle, Friedman, Barry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.