· 8/11/1992
McGriff v. BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLE
Citations
- 613 A.2d 688
- 149 Pa. Commw. 638
- 1992 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 540
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that any reliance by the parole board on inadmissible hearsay did not violate due process
- concluding that a petition sounded in mandamus and was within our original jurisdiction when the petitioner “alleged an error by the Board in the application of the regulations governing detainer orders”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Doyle, Friedman, Barry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.