McGrew v. McGrew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although family court had jurisdiction to determine custody of children of separated parents, it does not have jurisdiction to determine support owed under separation agreement because agreement involves contractual rights
• although family court had jurisdiction to determine custody of children of separated parents, it does not have jurisdiction to determine support owed under separation agreement because agreement involves contractual rights
• the family court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to determine the arrearage due under a separation agreement because any such liability was based solely upon the agree ment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fielden v. Fielden
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-01-17· cited 12×
• Kelly v. Edwards
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-05-26· cited 10×
• Allen v. Allen
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-04-15· cited 7×
• Wilson v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-04-16· cited 6×
• Cannon v. Cannon
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-10-05· cited 2×
• Roberts v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-10-12· cited 2×
• Frank Rish, Sr. v. Kathy Rish
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2024-07-31

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cason v. Cason
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-09-18· cited 13×
• Bond v. Bond
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-03-11· cited 10×