Skip to main content
· 8/19/1986

McGrew v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.

Citations

  • 497 N.E.2d 424
  • 147 Ill. App. 3d 104
  • 100 Ill. Dec. 446
  • 1986 Ill. App. LEXIS 2754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he mere existence of an ulterior motive in performing an otherwise proper act does not constitute abuse of process”
  • Anything said or written in a legal proceeding is protected from defamation actions by absolute privilege
  • “Illinois, like most states, does not recognize a cause of action for punitive damages alone”
  • “[T]he rules on absolute privilege in defamation actions apply to invasion of privacy suits as well.”
  • “the validity of the underlying debt is simply irrelevant to an abuse of process claim”
  • “punitive damages represent a type of relief rather than an independent cause of action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scariano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.