McGregor v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]o allow participation, or even presence, by the State would thwart the Supreme Court’s attempt to place indigent defendants, as nearly as possible, on a level of equality with nonindigent defendants.”
• Ake requires ex parte hearings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-10-15· cited 716×
• McGregor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-12-06· cited 119×
• State v. Barnett
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1995-11-13· cited 98×
• Frederick v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-08-30· cited 11×
• McGregor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-05-11· cited 10×
• Addison v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-08· cited 10×
• Washington v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1990-10-29· cited 10×
• People of Guam v. Eric Juan Palacios Quitugua
  Supreme Court of Guam· 2021-12-10· cited 1×
• Commonwealth v. Russell
  Fairfax County Circuit Court· 1994-04-26

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Ake v. Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×