Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Third Circuit· 6/28/2005

McGreevy v. Stroup

Citations

  • 413 F.3d 359
  • 2005 WL 1515891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a school district superintendent is a final policymaker over employee ratings determinations because 24 Pa. C.S. § 11-1123 grants superintendents such final authority
  • explaining that a “claim for civil conspiracy requires that two or more people conspire to do an unlawful act”
  • discussing Monell v. Dep't, of Soc. Serv., 436 U.S. 658, 694, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978)
  • parties did not dispute that “advocacy on behalf of . . . two disabled students” was a “matter[] of true public concern”
  • a Pennsylvania school board is final policymaker regarding dismissal of employees, but the superintendent is the final policymaker over employee ratings determinations
  • “[A]n official with policymaking authority can create official policy, even by rendering a single decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Becker, Stapleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named McGreevy v. Stroup

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.