McGreevy v. Stroup

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a school district superintendent is a final policymaker over employee ratings determinations because 24 Pa. C.S. § 11-1123 grants superintendents such final authority
• explaining that a “claim for civil conspiracy requires that two or more people conspire to do an unlawful act”
• discussing Monell v. Dep't, of Soc. Serv., 436 U.S. 658, 694, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978)
• parties did not dispute that “advocacy on behalf of . . . two disabled students” was a “matter[] of true public concern”
• a Pennsylvania school board is final policymaker regarding dismissal of employees, but the superintendent is the final policymaker over employee ratings determinations
• “[A]n official with policymaking authority can create official policy, even by rendering a single decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).