McGraw v. Loyola Ford, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute itself is the primary source for determining the intent of the legislature, and the Court is to “ ‘give[ ] that language its natural and ordinary meaning’”
• bringing fraud and claim under the Act based on the same set of underlying facts
• using “intentional misrepresentation” and “fraud” interchangeably and listing the required elements
• “Failure to articulate an argument in an opening brief constitutes a waiver of that issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).