McGrath v. TCF BANK SAV., FSB

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting review “for the sole purpose of 6 clarifying the decision of the court of appeals”
• requiring jury instructions to reflect the applicable law by allowing a plaintiff to prevail, despite other legitimate reasons for the discharge, \if an illegitimate reason 'more likely than not' motivated the discharge decision\
• “[E]ven if an employer has a legitimate reason for the discharge, a plaintiff may 6 nevertheless prevail if an illegitimate reason more likely than not motivated the discharge decision.” (quotation omitted)
• “[E]ven if an employer has a legitimate reason for the [employment action], a plaintiff may nevertheless prevail if an illegitimate reason ‘more likely than not’ motivated the ... decision.” (quoting Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., 417 N.W.2d 619, 627 (Minn. 1988))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).