McGrath v. Burke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a state statute violated the Commerce Clause because it effectively required other states to adopt similar regulations
• indicating that a statute is invalid where it has the “practical effect” of controlling commerce wholly outside the state
• “ ‘the Commerce Clause precludes the application of a state statute to commerce that takes place wholly outside of the State’s borders, whether or not the commerce has effects within the State...’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).