McGowan v. Shearer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that RFC for medium work, with no twisting/postural limitations, is not inconsistent with consultative examiner’s opinion that plaintiff had, inter alia, up to moderate limitation in repetitive bending/twisting of the lumbar spine
• “The ability to chop wood contradicted Plaintiff’s testimony that he could not perform . . . manual labor.”
• RFC for medium exertional work was consistent with a doctor’s opinion that the plaintiff had a mild-to- moderate limitation in repetitive bending or twisting of the lumbar spine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).