Skip to main content
· 2/28/1995

McGough v. Gabus

Citations

  • 526 N.W.2d 328
  • 1995 WL 25989

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a jury could find the defendant had recklessly disregarded the truth where he overvalued the worth of the business in spite of a “substantially lower” appraisal
  • reiterating standard: “whether the complaining party, in view of his own information and intelligence, had a right to rely on the representations”
  • stating one element of a fraud claim is “intent to deceive,” but noting that to receive punitive damages, an additional finding of “willful and wanton conduct” must be made
  • fraud may arise from a special relationship giving rise to a duty to disclose and failure to make that disclosure
  • fraud may arise from a special relationship giving rise to a duty to disclose and failure to make that disclosure
  • fraud may arise from a special relationship giving rise to a duty to disclose and failure to make that disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Larson, Carter, Neuman, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.