· 1/21/2011
McGOOKIN v. Guidant Corp.
Citations
- 942 N.E.2d 831
- 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 56
- 2011 WL 204334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining claims were expressly preempted where the plaintiffs failed to allege a violation of federal law
- “The MDA and Riegel could not be clearer that federal law broadly preempts any claim that would allow a jury to impose a standard of care different from or in addition to the FDA’s specific federal requirements.”
- “The MDA and Riegel could not be clearer that federal law broadly preempts any claim that would allow a jury to impose a standard of care different from or in addition to the FDA’s specific federal requirements.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Vaidik, Barnes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.