McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment for the defendant when evidence suggested that defendant’s “products might have been used once,” but no evidence showed that products contained asbestos at the time
• “Plaintiffs cannot manufacture a triable issue of fact through use of an expert opinion ... devoid of any basis, explanation, or reasoning.”
• “[A] court is not bound by expert opinion that is speculative or conjectural.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).