McGogney v. Mutual Life Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that ‘[h]ad the court not addressed the issue, or refrained from giving the impression that a hearing would be scheduled by the court, [the plaintiff] would have been required to file the motion under Rule 54(d)(2).
• interpreting the Rules is a legal question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).