McGinnis v. Wine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding jury's improper finding of not guilty on lesser-included offenses to be surplusage for which retrial was not barred and opining that asking jury to again deliberate in order to return a proper verdict \may have been the better course....\
• finding jury's improper finding of not guilty on lesser-included offenses to be surplusage for which retrial was not barred and opining that asking jury to again deliberate in order to return a proper verdict \may have been the better course. . . .\
• \[T]he double jeopardy clause precludes retrial 'once the reviewing court has found the evidence legally insufficient' to support the conviction.\
• double jeopardy does not preclude retrial on lesser included offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).