Skip to main content
· 3/16/2009

McGinnis Ex Rel. McGinnis v. Union Pacific Railroad

Citations

  • 612 F. Supp. 2d 776
  • 2009 WL 816414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that no substantial controversy, and so no justiciable claim, exists where, among other things, insured had not been sued by anyone injured in the accident and there was no other pending litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith P. Ellison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.