McGill v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a contract must be read as a whole \so that one may not create an ambiguity by pointing out a single sentence or clause\
• holding that party may not “circumvent the contracts condition precedent by arguing substantial compliance”
• holding that party may not “circumvent the contracts condition precedent by arguing substantial compliance”
• holding a civil conspiracy action is generally an action at law
• examining contractual language to ascertain the parties’ intentions and giving it legal effect
• “Where the contract’s language is clear and unambiguous, the language alone determines the contract’s force and effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).