McGill v. Auto Ass'n of Mich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it is unlikely that the insureds would be liable for these expenses”
• finding proposed class plaintiffs claims atypical: “[There is] no evidence that Plaintiffs have suffered injury as a result of Defendants’ partial payment of their medical bills; nor is any injury threatened.”
• finding proposed class plaintiff's claims atypical: “[There is] no evidence that Plaintiffs have suffered injury as a result of Defendants' partial payment of their medical bills; nor is any injury threatened.”
• finding proposed class plaintiff's claims atypical: “[There is] no evidence that Plaintiffs have suffered injury as a result of Defendants' partial payment of their medical bills; nor is any injury threatened.”
• finding no error in the refusal to certify the plaintiffs’ proposed class and explaining that “[b]ecause plaintiffs cannot maintain their individual causes of action, they are unqualified to represent the purported class[]”
• requesting “such further relief as shall be agreeable to equity and good conscience”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).