Skip to main content
· 4/27/1984

McGill Incorporated v. John Zink Company, McGill Incorporated, Cross-Appellant v. John Zink Company, Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 736 F.2d 666
  • 221 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 944
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing jury verdict where construction premised on facts not supported by substantial evidence
  • “Prosecution history may be used not only in an estoppel context but also as a claim interpretation tool”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kashiwa, Cow-En, Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.