· 4/27/1984
McGill Incorporated v. John Zink Company, McGill Incorporated, Cross-Appellant v. John Zink Company, Cross-Appellee
Citations
- 736 F.2d 666
- 221 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 944
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15008
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing jury verdict where construction premised on facts not supported by substantial evidence
- “Prosecution history may be used not only in an estoppel context but also as a claim interpretation tool”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kashiwa, Cow-En, Bennett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.