McGehee v. Dupuy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting employee’s request for adverse inference because he “point[ed] to no evidence” that allegedly destroyed notes “ever existed”
• “The simple fact that the Department’s policy was for selection board members to discard their notes says nothing about whether such notes were kept to begin with.”
• without proper statistical analysis, “the Court has no basis on which to assess whether any disparity . . . may be caused by the challenged [practice] rather than the randomness of chance, the overall small number of [members of the protected class], or some other factor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).