McGee v. Muldowney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a plaintiff must generally present “objective medical evidence as to the degree of any impairment and extent of pain suffered.”
• stating that compliance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure is a mandate and that the Rules of Appellate Procedure are not to be treated as a “guidepost”
• stating that a plaintiff must generally present “objective medical evidence as to the degree of any impairment and extent of any pain suffered” relative to an automobile accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Peterman v. Sakalauskas
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-10-10· cited 3×
• Sekol v. Albrecht
  Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 2001-03-23
• Ramos v. Jones
  Northampton County Court of Common Pleas· 2014-06-18
• Nikoo v. Hunt
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 2000-09-21
• Anthony v. Browne
  Monroe County Court of Common Pleas· 2001-12-07
• Lewis v. McClain
  Fayette County Court· 2005-07-07
• Stout v. Deleo
  Monroe County Court of Common Pleas· 2011-02-02
• Dengler v. Marsh
  Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas· 2012-10-03
• Bridgeman v. Cruz
  Monroe County Court of Common Pleas· 2012-05-18

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• DiFranco v. Pickard
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1986-12-23· cited 173×
• Washington v. Baxter
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-29· cited 159×
• Dodson v. Elvey
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-09-28· cited 71×
• Kelly v. Ziolko
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-25· cited 17×
• In the Interest of Crespo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-29· cited 5×