McGaughey v. Urbach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that biomechanical engineer was not qualified to testify about the causal relationship between an accident and the injuries of the plaintiff because he was not a medical doctor
• explaining that biomechanical engineer was not qualified to testify about the causal relationship between an accident and the injuries of the plaintiff because he was not a medical doctor
• explaining that biomechanical engineer was not qualified to testify about the causal relationship between an accident and the injuries of the plaintiff because he was not a medical doctor
• explaining that biomechanical engineer was not qualified to testify about the causal relationship between an accident and the injuries of the plaintiff because he was not a medical doctor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).