Wyoming Supreme Court· 10/4/2002
McGarvey v. State
Citations
- 2002 WY 149
- 55 P.3d 703
- 2002 Wyo. LEXIS 164
- 2002 WL 31206400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- possession together with opportunity and witness identification of the defendant as the person who forged the victim’s name was sufficient to support burglary conviction
- possession together with opportunity and witness identification of the defendant as the person who forged the victim's name was sufficient to support burglary conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Golden, Hill, Kite, Lehman, Voigt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bittleston v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2019-06-20· cited 19×
- Carlos Yammon Pena v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2015-11-24· cited 10×
- Cureton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2003-03-31· cited 8×
- Miranda Rose Mraz v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2014-06-10· cited 8×
- Burkhardt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2005-08-18· cited 6×
- Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2004-05-18· cited 6×
- Ferguson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2007-10-05· cited 5×
- William E. Ogden v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2022-09-13· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.