MCG Health, Inc. v. Barton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying abuse-of-discretion standard in reviewing trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to exclude testimony of plaintiffs medical expert
• applying abuse of discretion standard to motion to exclude expert’s testimony on summary judgment under predecessor to Rule 702
• affirming the denial of the Board of Regents’s motion for summary judgment since a jury question regarding causation existed based upon expert testimony that the physician’s delay in diagnosing the patient’s torsion condition prevented emergency surgery to salvage the patient’s testicle
• issue of qualification turns on the allegations of the complaint and not on the particular practice area of the defendant physician
• “[t]he issue of the admissibility or exclusion of expert testimony rests in the broad discretion of the court, and consequently, the trial court’s ruling thereon cannot be reversed absent an abuse of discretion”
• “[t]he issue of the admissibility or exclusion of expert testimony rests in the broad discretion of the court, and consequently, the trial court’s ruling thereon cannot be reversed absent an abuse of discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).