Skip to main content
· 10/15/1920

McFarlane v. Dormand

Citations

  • 123 Miss. 434
  • 86 So. 267

Syllabus

<p>Appeal and ebbob. Supreme Court may extend tim,e for transcribing stenographer’s notes by order made more than thirty days after, application.</p> <p>Under Laws 1920, chapter 145, amending Laws 1910, chapter 111, adjding sections 797a and 797b to Code 1906, relating to extension of time, the Supreme Court may grant an application by a court stenographer for an extension of thirty days in which to tran~ scribe and file his notes of the evidence in a case, though because of an adjournment thirty days have expired since the application was filed in that court, and more than thirty days have expired since the sixty days allowed by statute for the stenographer to transcribe his notes, though no more than the thirty days allowed by statute can be allowed under any circumstances.</p>

Judges: Eti, Iridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.