McFarland v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Wjhere the issues in each motion are not related to each other, the trial court does not lose jurisdiction over the later-filed motion.”
• “While an appeal of a prior postconviction motion is pending, the trial court has no jurisdiction to rule on a subsequent post-conviction motion when the issues in the two motions are related.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-05· cited 2×
• Howard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-11· cited 1×
• Robert Glen Hill, II v. Julie L Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-17
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-19
• Biggs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-29

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bates v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-17· cited 24×
• Kimmel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-20· cited 17×