McFarland v. Hatchett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[i]nsofar as plaintiff relies on Regal’s promises of future satisfaction, his allegations are not actionable under a theory of negligent misrepresentation.”
• finding a seller's statement \touting the quality of its boats in general\ constituted \ 'puffing' and are not actionable under a negligent misrepresentation theory\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).