McFarland v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no showing of the materiality of the missing testimony, that due diligence was used to obtain the evidence, or the facts the witness would prove
• testimony under oath was not an “acceptable or sufficient substitute for the required affidavit” in a request to continue a trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gray v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2006-10-31· cited 69×
• Farris v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1992-07-17· cited 9×
• Wahl v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1972-11-03· cited 7×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Abdon v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1931-01-16· cited 12×
• Pennington v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1963-10-04· cited 6×
• Litteral v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1928-03-02· cited 3×