McFaddin v. Jefferson County Drainage Dist. No. 6.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating whether an act is discretionary or ministerial is a “key question relating to the determination of qualified immunity . . . .”
• referring to Section 4001 as a form of governmental immunity known as “qualified immunity”
• acknowledging need for discovery to determine whether DYRS employee defendants breached ministerial duties
• The doctrine against claim splitting is “designed to prevent a litigant from getting ‘two bites at the apple.’”
• ‘Whether vel non the defendant acted in bad faith or with gross negligence are ... inherently factual question.”
• “The claim splitting doctrine presumes that the interest of fairness will require a plaintiff to present all ofhis theories relating to one transaction in a single action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).