McFadden v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Q]uestion[s] of fact . . . [are] more appropriately addressed on summary judgment or at trial” (citation omitted)
• discovery rule applied to statements made at a grievance hearing in the presence of labor and management officials at WMATA, “a limited audience akin to a specialized readership”
• “there is no individual liability under the ADA or the 15 Rehabilitation Act.”
• no individual liability under the ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).