McFadden v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding, where defendant argued that he was prejudiced by “the exposure of prospective jurors to publicity,” that “[p]retrial publicity did not actually prejudice the defendant”
• stating extreme sanction of dismissal with prejudice reserved for extraordinary circumstances when government’s misconduct has prejudiced defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).