Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

McFadden v. Missouri

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 65
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 52
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3180
  • 571 U.S. 832
  • 2013 WL 1743744
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that an agency's failure to mention contrary scientific studies renders its conclusions arbitrary and capricious
  • observing that an agency’s failure to mention contrary scientific studies renders its conclusions arbitrary and capricious
  • observing that an agency’s failure to mention con- trary scientific studies renders its conclusions arbitrary and capricious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.