McFadden v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that a statute preventing application of preclusion principles to a final judgment on the merits would violate the Oregon state constitution on separation of powers grounds
• suggesting that a statute preventing application of preclusion principles to a final judgment on the merits would violate the Oregon state constitution on separation of powers grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Berkson v. LePome
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2010-12-16· cited 24×
• City of Damascus v. State of Oregon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-09-03· cited 8×
• Bonner v. American Golf Corp. of California
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2024-10-31· cited 3×
• Fox v. Collins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-27· cited 2×
• Kambury v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-08-16

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Western Helicopter Services, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-14· cited 106×
• DeMendoza v. Huffman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-08-08· cited 52×
• Macartney v. Shipherd
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1911-09-19· cited 48×
• Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-06-08· cited 44×
• Circuit Court v. AFSCME Local 502-A
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-08-31· cited 33×
• Thomas v. Portland
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1901-10-28· cited 18×
• STATE EX REL. HUNTINGTON, ETC. v. Sulmonetti
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-12-16· cited 15×
• A.K.H. v. R.C.T.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-19· cited 14×
• Dahlstrom v. Huntington Rubber Mills
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-01-19· cited 4×