Skip to main content
· 11/25/1878

McFadden v. Dingle

Citations

  • 11 S.C. 190
  • 1878 S.C. LEXIS 50

Syllabus

<p>A sealed note for 351397, dated March 30th, 1870, and payable November 1st, 1871, “in currency at its gold value on the 10th day of January last passed,” held to mean that the obligor would pay to the obligee at the maturity of the note so much money in currency as §1397 in gold would' have commanded on January 10th, 1870. Haskell, A. J., dissented.</p>

Judges: Haskell, McIvee, Willard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.