McElwain v. McElwain's Guardian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Simply because something has not yet happened does not mean that its happening is not foreseeable.”
• “[T]he sole question posed by the motion can be stated simply: is there a genuine dispute of fact as to whether Cinemark knew or should have known of the danger faced by the patrons in Auditorium 9 on July 20, 2012?”
• text and red arrows added by court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).