McElrouge v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to continue trial to hire new private investigator after first investigator could not testify, concluding that decision not to use an investigator was strategic and non-prejudicial
• such “strategic decision[s], whether wise in retrospect or not, [are] among those professional judgment calls that are ‘unchallengeable’ under Strickland’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).