McElhinney v. Fitzpatrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that CDC did not have power to impose nationwide moratorium on the eviction of renters during pandemic
• recognizing that “[d]espite the CDC’s determination that [residential] landlords should bear a significant financial cost of the pandemic, many landlords have modest means”
• concluding that an economic impact of $50 billion was of vast economic significance
• explaining that a moratorium on evictions did not directly relate to preventing the spread of COVID-19
• holding CDC’s eviction moratorium “intrude[d] into an area that is the particular domain of state law: the landlord-tenant relationship”
• holding CDC’s eviction moratorium “intrude[d] into an area that is the particular domain of state law: the landlord-tenant relationship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).