Skip to main content
· 12/28/1889

McEachran v. McEachran

Citations

  • 82 Cal. 219
  • 23 P. 46
  • 1889 Cal. LEXIS 838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The FAA applies in state and federal courts to all contracts containing an arbitration clause that involves or affects interstate commerce.”
  • no federal policy favoring arbitration under a certain set of procedural rules; the FAA does not set forth applicable procedures; and “[i]t is beyond dispute . . . that [the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] do not apply in state court proceedings.”
  • “It is one thing to find that Congress intended to impose federal substantive or procedural rules on a type of case that a State has opened its courts to hear. It would be quite another thing to find that Congress intended to require a State to open its courts to hear such a case.”
  • “It is one thing to find that Congress intended to impose federal substantive or procedural rules on a type of case that a State has opened its courts to hear. It would be quite another thing to find that Congress intended to require a State to open its courts to hear such a case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Belcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.