· 12/28/1889
McEachran v. McEachran
Citations
- 82 Cal. 219
- 23 P. 46
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 838
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The FAA applies in state and federal courts to all contracts containing an arbitration clause that involves or affects interstate commerce.”
- no federal policy favoring arbitration under a certain set of procedural rules; the FAA does not set forth applicable procedures; and “[i]t is beyond dispute . . . that [the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] do not apply in state court proceedings.”
- “It is one thing to find that Congress intended to impose federal substantive or procedural rules on a type of case that a State has opened its courts to hear. It would be quite another thing to find that Congress intended to require a State to open its courts to hear such a case.”
- “It is one thing to find that Congress intended to impose federal substantive or procedural rules on a type of case that a State has opened its courts to hear. It would be quite another thing to find that Congress intended to require a State to open its courts to hear such a case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Belcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.