McDuffie v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dog- tracking evidence, while admissible if a proper foundation is established, is insufficient standing alone to support a criminal conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• VanPelt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2009-12-18· cited 41×
• State v. Scharmer
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-06-11· cited 20×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-01-16· cited 19×
• State v. Mark J. Bucki
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2020-06-02· cited 12×
• Van Pelt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-08-14· cited 11×
• Tariq-Madyun v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2010-05-28· cited 8×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Neil v. Biggers
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
• Cook v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1977-04-28· cited 59×
• State v. Streeper
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1987-12-10· cited 15×
• Wilkie v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-03-21· cited 14×
• Herme v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-03-25· cited 12×
• Crosby v. Moriarty
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1921-02-04· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Michaux
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-12· cited 9×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-10-31· cited 7×