McDuffie v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “certificate of title serves not only as a substitute recording system but also as evidence of ownership”
• noting that “[i]n order to preserve an issue for appeal, ‘an objection must be timely made and the grounds stated with specificity’” (quoting Marlowe v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 619, 621 (1986))
• finding the evidence sufficient to prove the intent required under Code § 18.2-137(B
• “[C]ertificate of title serves not only as a substitute recording system but also as evidence of ownership.”
• “In order to preserve an issue for appeal, ‘an objection must be timely made and the grounds stated with specificity.’” (quoting Marlowe v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 619, 621, 347 S.E.2d 167, 168 (1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).