McDonough v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to adopt this court’s conclusion that § 2D1.1(b)(5) does not require a mens rea element
• “[F]actual findings [are reviewed] for clear error . . . .”
• “From the record 12 available, it appears that Officer Dedonato only observed: (1) Job at a location where the officers 13 were conducting either an arrest of another person . . . ; (2) Job and Holt open the garage door as 14 the police were arriving; (3
• stating evidentiary standard for a sentencing enhancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).