McDonough v. Spraggins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an arbitration agreement between a healthcare provider and its subcontractor because its terms were bilateral- i.e. , binding both parties to arbitrate certain claims
• “conclud[ing] that the Supreme Court of New Mexico would recognize that a nonsignatory to an arbitration agreement may successfully rely on the doctrine of equitable estoppel to compel arbitration”
• compelling arbitration against non-signatories where they were doing business as a joint venture with signatories and where allegations asserted claims which referred to each entity associated with the joint venture
• “Moreover, [Figueroa] is not good law, at least for the courts in the Tenth Circuit.”
• “The Court concludes that the Supreme Court of New Mexico would recognize that a nonsignatory to an arbitration agreement may successfully rely on the doctrine of equitable estoppel to compel arbitration.”
• “The Court concludes that the Supreme Court of New Mexico would recognize that a nonsignatory to an arbitration agreement may successfully rely on the doctrine of equitable estoppel to compel arbitration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).