McDonough v. Keniston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “remedy for oppressive, annoying and improper deposition questioning is not defendant, as required by Rule 30(b)(3)” and “for failure to arrange to have the videotaping conducted by an appropriate person, as required by Rules 30(b)(4) and 28(c)”
• “Speaking objections and coaching objections are simply not permitted in depositions in federal cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Calzaturficio S.C.A.R.P.A. S.P.A. V. Fabiano Shoe Co.
  D. Massachusetts· 2001-06-14· cited 40×
• Neuberger Berman Real Estate Income Fund, Inc. v. Lola Brown Trust No. 1B
  D. Maryland· 2005-06-23· cited 38×
• Security National Bank v. Abbott Laboratories
  N.D. Iowa· 2014-07-28· cited 10×
• LM Insurance v. ACEO, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2011-07-21· cited 4×
• State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Dowdy
  N.D. Oklahoma· 2006-07-21· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Herbert v. Lando
  Supreme Court· 1979-04-18· cited 1,085×
• Damaj v. Farmers Insurance
  N.D. Oklahoma· 1995-12-27· cited 13×

Other cases named McDonough v. Keniston

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• McDonough v. Keniston
  D. New Hampshire· 1997-09-12