McDonough Associates, Incorpor v. Ann Schneider

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts may not “direct a state to make payments to resolve a private debt or remedy a past injury to a private party”
• explaining that courts cannot “direct a state to make payments … to remedy a past injury to a private party”
• explaining that the Ex parte Young exception to the Eleventh Amendment bar on suing states in banning registrants from living too close to day cares. Vasquez, 895 F.3d at 525 (7th Cir. 2018) (abrogated on other grounds in Koch v. Hartland, 42 F.4th 747 (7th Cir. 2022)
• “pleading requirements in habeas proceedings should not be overly technical and stringent.”
• Eleventh Amendment bars claims seeking \awards of 'accrued monetary liability which must be met from the general revenues of a State'\
• “[T]he general rule is that private individuals are unable to sue a state in federal court absent the state’s consent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).