McDonald's Corp. v. McBagel's, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant attempted to capitalize not only from its use of plaintiffs famous trademark, but also from the publicity generated by the litigation between the parties
• court upholds validity of survey even though many interviewees had never heard of alleged infringer's products or services and were not near places where such products or services were featured
• “[t]his is not a case where an injunction will unfairly disadvantage a second user who has expended considerable sums to promote his trademark before the first user raised the issue of infringement”
• court upholds validity of survey even though many interviewees had never heard of alleged infringer’s products or services and were not near places where such products or services were featured
• \King Kong” and \Donkey Kong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).