McDonald's Corp. v. DRUCK AND GERNER, DDS., PC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant does not suffer the requisite prejudice when an injunction would merely require defendant to incur minimal expenses associated with removing the mark from the product
• “ ‘[cjommonly cited criteria of prejudice are the expenditure of significant amounts for the advertising and promotion of the mark or a general business expansion as a result of the increased demand for the product being sold under the mark in question.’ ’’(citation omitted)
• bad faith alone sufficient to bar laches defense
• measuring the strength of the mark from the present standpoint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).